Is Joe Arpaio Really “Misinformed” About Illegal Immigration Patrols?

See Also: Brian Sands' Testimony Contradicted by His Statements in 2010 See Also: Joe Arpaio's (ahem) Legal Scholar Brett Palmer and Brian Sands Under Oath See Also: Joe Arpaio Struggles in Racial-Profiling Trial See Also: Joe Arpaio's Deputy Thinks Most Day-Laborers Are Undocumented Brian Sands, one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

See Also: Brian Sands’ Testimony Contradicted by His Statements in 2010
See Also: Joe Arpaio’s (ahem) Legal Scholar Brett Palmer and Brian Sands Under Oath
See Also: Joe Arpaio Struggles in Racial-Profiling Trial
See Also: Joe Arpaio’s Deputy Thinks Most Day-Laborers Are Undocumented

Brian Sands, one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s deputy chiefs, testified yesterday that the sheriff was sometimes “misinformed” about his crime-suppression patrols.

“Arpaio sometimes is misinformed, through no fault of his own,” Sands said.

Sands claimed some of Arpaio’s press releases about the saturation patrols — specifically one press release claiming an operation was targeting day laborers — were bogus.

When news happens, Phoenix New Times is there —
Your support strengthens our coverage.

We’re aiming to raise $30,000 by December 31, so we can continue covering what matters most to you. If New Times matters to you, please take action and contribute today, so when news happens, our reporters can be there.

$30,000

So, the judge asked Sands, is the goal to just round up illegal immigrants during those patrols?

“That’s not the goal or objective…but it’s the results that occur,” Sands said. “If people are arrested and, subsequently, they’re in the country illegally, that’s the end result of stopping a certain amount of people.”

As our colleague Ray Stern pointed out later yesterday, Sands was singing a different tune a couple years back:

Sands, to put the statements in context, had been responding to questions by investigators about the times he had “points of conflict” with [former chief deputy Dave] Hendershott, who was fired by Arpaio (then allowed to retire) after the investigation concluded he had committed unethical and possibly illegal acts for years as Arpaio’s right-hand man. Arpaio later claimed he was “duped” by Hendershott and knew nothing about his chief deputy’s activities — even though evidence showed he had near-daily briefings by Hendershott, and that Hendershott was probably just following Arpaio’s orders.

Sands described one point of conflict as taking place on the 2008 saturation patrol. He claimed he “cautioned” Hendershott that “we can’t do massive arrests when it comes to illegal aliens” because of the “complexity of our relationship” with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau and the 287(g) cross-training status of sheriff’s deputies.

“I think (Hendershott’s) issue was that he wanted to see something that would, you know, be very newsworthy out there,” Sands told investigators.

Related

That said, how “misinformed” was Arpaio?

Cast your vote below:


Related

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the This Week’s Top Stories newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...